using the world wide web to share news about my wonderful daughter, all the while brainstorming little acts of subversion

Sunday, September 14, 2008

I wish they were truly pro-life

McCain/Palin have brought abortion back into presidential politics. Okay- I guess single-minded conservatives never let it go away. I mean, it's not like women in this country can get too comfortable with any control over their own lives.

The entrance of Palin's pregnant daughter, however, reveals the numerous ways that so-called "pro-lifer" (or, better put, anti-choice) wingnuts (yes, you are) are a bunch of hypocrits. I've long thought about my position on abortion, and how exactly I would explain it. And now, the very "choice" of which Palin and her daughter so proudly tout- the same choice she would deny to every other woman in this country- needs to be articulated for the hypocrisy it is.

First, if they chose life, if they were so dedicated to choosing it, then it should never have been a "choice." Perhaps this was just their choice of words, but it reveals that at some point, it was something they thought about- whether or not Sarah should keep Trig to full term, or if Bristol should become one of millions of teen mothers. In other words, they deployed the very "choice" that so many women and feminists have been working hard to maintain for the last thirty years and that Palin proclaims she wants to take away. What I'm saying is, why was it ever a thought if either woman should keep it, if this is an issue they believe so deeply in?

Next, I have a real problem with right-wingers who will exert control over my life and my body while pregnant, but if a woman's poor or, God forbid, got brown skin, she's left to fend for herself, postpartum. So-called pro-lifers want to control pregnancy, but not human life; they want to say when and how a woman can get pregnant, and by whom, but don't want to do anything for that child once he or she is born. Republicans are the first to cut social services for those very people who need it most, and yet espouse the position that a woman should carry a child to term, no matter what. To make it clear: "little government" conservatives want as little government intervention as possible in just about everything and they don't want to be told what to do with their money- but they do want to tell me what I can do with my body. Tell me how that makes sense?

So, I truly do wish it was about life. Instead, abortion in this country is about control- controlling women's bodies, their choices, their ability to procreate or not. So what do I propose? Namely, a few changes:

1. We need education. Not only do girls need to know EARLY how pregnancy happens, but so do boys. They need to know that girls do get pregnant on the first time, and that "blue balls" or whatever does not exist. Girls are not the only ones responsible for getting pregnant- and both parties need to be educated (by the way: sex ed usually includes abstinence ed in addition to everything else; why not have all our bases covered?)

2. Pregnant women and mothers need support from across society. Pregnancy is not some easy walk in the park. It's dangerous. Women die regularly from being pregnant- the U.S. has one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the world; we're right up there with developing countries. And that has to do with lack of access to prenatal care to catch the things that kill pregnant women, like high blood pressure (had that myself) and gestational diabetes (almost had that, too). To be pro-life, in my eyes, is to be nurturing of life in general- not just some narrow view defined for political gain.

And so mothers deserve paid maternity leave, and an invigoration of female support networks- at the least. For a country that is so "pro-life" and "pro-family," we have some of the most regressive family leave policies in the developed world. Not to mention- how hard is it to install freakin' diaper changers in every public restroom? And modern medicine and public discourse belittles and circumscribes access for women to the female networks- and the support of other community networks in general- that ease the transition postpartum- not to mention, help women work together and give each other advice on breastfeeding. Parenting with two parents is difficult enough- I can't even imagine how single parents do it. The lack of family leave policies that allow lengthy maternity and paternity leave, however, render even dual-parent households "single parented" in the sense that the father (or partner) leaves all day while the mother (or other parent) spends all day by themselves.

3. We need to end misogyny. We need to change the culture that does not respect women to make choices for their own lives. By saying that women cannot make their own decisions about their own bodies, we remain the property of others- we remain objects in society, not equals.

But perhaps, that's how Palin views herself. Perhaps she truly sees herself as her husband's property. You know what, though? I don't. And my daughter will not grow up in a world that teaches her she belongs to any one besides herself. And that is only one of the things anti-choice nutcases espouse. Maybe that's fine in your household- maybe. But not mine. And that's what being pro-choice is all about.

5 comments:

Eric Dion Baker said...

Hello Katie - I got a copy of this blog post from a mutual friend of ours, Larry F. I am a Christian, conservative, Republican, pro-life father of five, my wife is at home taking care of our children, and yes, we home school also. I am looking forward to this conversation with you.

First - let's clarify a few things. The term "Pro-life" only came about as a result of the term "Pro-choice". It is Pro "Life" because the "Choice" is death, I mean abortion. Oh wait, they are the same thing. That's right, abortion is death. See, the problem with pro-choice is that you are not advocating a choice, you are advocating abortion, because that *is* the choice. There are no other options. you either have the baby, or you abort it. That's the "choice" you advocate, and to not choose life is to choose abortion. So again, to advocate "the choice" is to advocate abortion, becasue that is what "the choice" is.

Next - you reference a woman "choosing what to do with her body" - hmmm. That's a very pro-choice perspective, because it skews the real issue, which is not your body, but the *human life* inside of it. See, if a dog is preganant, we say she is having puppies. If a cat is preganant, we say she is having kittens. If a woman gets pregnant, I say she is having a baby. You say she has a medical condition and should be able to fix it, like taking Advil for a headache.

When a woman gets pregnant, she does not have some "medical condition" that may result in human life, she is housing a developing human life until it is ready to exist on it's own outside of the womb.

In reference to Palin, you say "why was it ever a thought if either woman should keep it, if this is an issue they believe so deeply in?" It wasn't a thought. The only reason it is an issue is because, and you're a mom so you know this to be true, is because if it is determined during the pregnancy that your child might be down, you are presented (in some cases encouraged) the option of aborting the child. Because in our word today you are actually asked that question, you can state that you chose life, even though really you did not opt for death, or should I say abortion?

As far as social services go, you make a great point. More does need to be done to provide the necessary support, and I am a huge advocate of programs like WIC. However, I believe that programs should *help* and *support*, not enable, create a dependency, or create a scenario where independence is a downgrade from assistance. This is the problem with the existing system, the part of the problem we as a society seem to ignore.

Also, you speak of education. Another great point. I think that since your side advocates the choice of abortion, and my side advocates the choice of life, perhaps we could both come together and advocate for the choice of abstinence. After all, which is safer, wear a bullet-proof vest or take the bullet out of the gun? Since you're pro-choice, maybe I should give you a third option of just getting shot and going to the hospital to have the bullet taken out. ;)

So, next maybe you're going to ask the favorite pro-choice question, what about rape or incest? I used to have difficulty with this as well. These are major issues in our society, I don't denegrate them at all. However, would you really argue that the issues that result are more important than the precious life they produce? You can't convince me that when you look at your baby, you honestly think that if she also reminded you of rape you would rather not have her. Not buying that. And it sounds a little different from that perspective doesn't it?

Also, here are some stats on that by the way -

(http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html - The following is a list of useful abortion statistics as well as some facts on abortifacients. All abortion numbers are derived from pro-abortion sources courtesy of The Alan Guttmacher Institute and Planned Parenthood's Family Planning Perspectives.)

Why women have abortions
1% of all abortions occur because of rape or incest; 6% of abortions occur because of potential health problems regarding either the mother or child, and 93% of all abortions occur for social reasons (i.e. the child is unwanted or inconvenient).

Hmmm... *the child* is "unwanted" or "inconvenient" 93% of the time. And that's just what is reported....moment of silence....

Now moving on.

"And so mothers deserve paid maternity leave" - holla back on that one. We can spit-shake on that issue. Our society is decreasing it's value on the family. This is courtesy of secular-progressive liberal influence, the same influence that waves the pro-choice(abortion) flag. Perhaps you are one of these liberals as well? The decline of the value of family in our society is why more programs are not available for women. Feminists claim we should not have them, because they think moms should work, and not stay home to take care of and provide the *best* possible care for their babies. If there are too many programs that advocate for motherhood, women may actually realize that they enjoy taking care of their babies more than working, that they would rather see their child's firsts instead of hear about them, that the first step is more important than the status meeting. Therefore, they (the feminists) provided the fuel to make motherhood more inconvenient. And thus the decline of the value of the family continued....

"So, I truly do wish it was about life." Interesting choice of words from someone pro-"choice".

Maybe tonight you can read your child "Horton Hears a Who".

eric

MaryAnn said...

First, Eric, get off of James Dobson's feminist talking points- you clearly know nothing about what feminists think or espouse. So, read up on that first- on something some other feminists have written first, and then we'll talk about what feminists "think."

And it's interesting particularly that you assume that women left the home because feminists told them to or that somehow we women ONLY like mothering- because clearly, that's the only thing that you think women should do. You know, let the man get the income and the women-folk stay at home.

Before I put on my antagonistic feminist hat- and I've got shit to do before I teach feminist theory in forty-five minutes- perhaps you'd like to come up to Iowa and sit in- perhaps this might be illuminating (although I don't think it will be):
Pregnancy is not something all women CHOOSE to do. Some do, some don't. But somehow, it always seems to be portrayed as OUR choice- not some act (usually) between man and woman. And what we feminists don't want is a society in which women get pregnant 18, 19, 20 times and die at 35 from the strain. And it's not like these women were whoring around either, Eric Dion Baker father of five; they were unable to say NO to their husbands, they were unable to LEARN how not to get pregnant, and they were sent to an early grave as a result.

So, being pro-choice is NOT about murder. It is about giving women the power to say NO and to control their own bodies. And try telling a rape victim she should love her child anyways-

...and this is where I get pissed: you typical man to assume that a woman's life is less important than any trauma she endures. You would sacrifice her mental health because you fail to see the extent of the violence upon her. And this is surprising, Eric Dion Baker, father of five- because what has the Republican Party ever done for a Black man anyways? You should know something about oppression.

MaryAnn said...

And I'm MaryAnn. Not Katie. That's my daughter. But you're probably too busy reading Dobson's talking points to actually read the bio on my blog. Big surprise- a well-read and attentive Republican is a rarity these days.

Eric Dion Baker said...

Mary Anne - Thx for the name update, I was emailed your post and responded, and the bio and what nots were not visible.

Next, before I respond, let's clarify. Would you like to have a civil, intelligent discussion between two adults with some opposing viewpoints, or a name-calling cussfest? I'm down for the discussion, but if you just want to yell and be pissed then no thanks.

If you have facebook, want to be friends? I'm sure we'll have a great time mudslinging over the upcoming weeks.

Your new black rightwinger brown-skinned nutjob Republican father of five typical male friend,

eric

Kim said...

Maryann, Can I meet you sometime? I absolutely love your views on these issues.

I happen to know Eric Baker, very well. I went to high school with him. He threw the same type of comments at me on my blog and we fought until I had to disable comments on that post. I was sick of it.

Keep nailing him, he needs it. His views are so backward. He sent me to your blog as he sent you to mine, but mine does not have the www in front of it, in case you cannot find it.

Keep up the good work. I agree with you on every point I have read on your blog so far and cannot wait to read more. I am putting your blog on my list on my sidebar.